Home / Technologies / Acquia vs BootstrapCDN
Acquia vs BootstrapCDN: who uses which
BootstrapCDN is on more sites: 1,029,154 against 139 for Acquia, about 7404.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Acquia | BootstrapCDN |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 62 | 466,747 |
| .org on .org | 11 | 49,342 |
| .uk in the UK | 3 | 34,337 |
| .jp in Japan | 1 | 30,826 |
| .net on .net | 1 | 29,877 |
| .de in Germany | 2 | 26,042 |
| .ru on .ru | 0 | 24,275 |
| .br in Brazil | 2 | 24,173 |
6 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Acquia or BootstrapCDN?
BootstrapCDN is on more sites: 1,029,154 against 139 for Acquia, about 7404.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Acquia and BootstrapCDN together?
6 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Acquia or BootstrapCDN as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.