Home / Technologies / Acquia vs CacheFly
Acquia vs CacheFly: who uses which
CacheFly is on more sites: 1,010 against 139 for Acquia, about 7.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Acquia | CacheFly |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 62 | 737 |
| .at in Austria | 0 | 49 |
| .org on .org | 11 | 35 |
| .uk in the UK | 3 | 21 |
| .tv on .tv | 0 | 20 |
| .net on .net | 1 | 17 |
| .it in Italy | 2 | 12 |
| .au in Australia | 6 | 7 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Acquia or CacheFly?
CacheFly is on more sites: 1,010 against 139 for Acquia, about 7.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Acquia and CacheFly together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Acquia or CacheFly as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.