Home / Technologies / Adobe Portfolio vs WP Super Cache
Adobe Portfolio vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 72,082 for Adobe Portfolio, about 4.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Adobe Portfolio | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 51,107 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 2,211 | 21,667 |
| .fr in France | 911 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 539 | 14,864 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 510 | 12,193 |
| .ru on .ru | 32 | 12,192 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,118 | 5,997 |
| .net on .net | 1,280 | 6,694 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Adobe Portfolio or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 72,082 for Adobe Portfolio, about 4.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Adobe Portfolio and WP Super Cache together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Adobe Portfolio or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.