Home / Technologies / Alpine.js vs Babel Polyfill
Alpine.js vs Babel Polyfill: who uses which
Alpine.js is on more sites: 185,949 against 22,009 for Babel Polyfill, about 8.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Alpine.js | Babel Polyfill |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 88,154 | 9,003 |
| .org on .org | 7,294 | 1,756 |
| .de in Germany | 7,799 | 304 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,615 | 93 |
| .net on .net | 5,595 | 538 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,482 | 260 |
| .fr in France | 3,775 | 515 |
| .dk in Denmark | 3,449 | 18 |
19 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Alpine.js or Babel Polyfill?
Alpine.js is on more sites: 185,949 against 22,009 for Babel Polyfill, about 8.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Alpine.js and Babel Polyfill together?
19 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Alpine.js or Babel Polyfill as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.