Home / Technologies / Alpine.js vs intl-tel-input
Alpine.js vs intl-tel-input: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 185,949 for Alpine.js, about 2.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Alpine.js | intl-tel-input |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 88,154 | 241,271 |
| .de in Germany | 7,799 | 14,251 |
| .org on .org | 7,294 | 14,730 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,482 | 11,279 |
| .net on .net | 5,595 | 8,615 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,615 | 5,191 |
| .in in India | 782 | 11,664 |
| .fr in France | 3,775 | 8,355 |
2,212 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Alpine.js or intl-tel-input?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 185,949 for Alpine.js, about 2.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Alpine.js and intl-tel-input together?
2,212 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Alpine.js or intl-tel-input as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.