Home / Technologies / Alpine.js vs Turbolinks
Alpine.js vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Alpine.js is on more sites: 185,949 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 5.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Alpine.js | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 88,154 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 7,294 | 2,993 |
| .de in Germany | 7,799 | 816 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,615 | 215 |
| .net on .net | 5,595 | 757 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,482 | 444 |
| .fr in France | 3,775 | 352 |
| .dk in Denmark | 3,449 | 235 |
199 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Alpine.js or Turbolinks?
Alpine.js is on more sites: 185,949 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 5.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Alpine.js and Turbolinks together?
199 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Alpine.js or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.