Home / Technologies / Alpine.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Alpine.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Alpine.js is on more sites: 185,949 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 4.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Alpine.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 88,154 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 7,799 | 885 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,615 | 841 |
| .org on .org | 7,294 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 5,595 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,482 | 957 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,099 | 3,400 |
| .fr in France | 3,775 | 740 |
382 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Alpine.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Alpine.js is on more sites: 185,949 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 4.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Alpine.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
382 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Alpine.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.