Home / Technologies / Amazon S3 vs Firebase Hosting
Amazon S3 vs Firebase Hosting: who uses which
Amazon S3 is on more sites: 537,883 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 619.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Amazon S3 | Firebase Hosting |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 321,490 | 425 |
| .org on .org | 31,099 | 29 |
| .uk in the UK | 15,006 | 12 |
| .net on .net | 11,132 | 35 |
| .br in Brazil | 9,999 | 4 |
| .de in Germany | 9,877 | 5 |
| .au in Australia | 8,870 | 3 |
| .co in Colombia | 6,421 | 8 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Amazon S3 or Firebase Hosting?
Amazon S3 is on more sites: 537,883 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 619.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Amazon S3 and Firebase Hosting together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Amazon S3 or Firebase Hosting as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.