Home / Technologies / AngularJS vs vanilla-lazyload
AngularJS vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
AngularJS is on more sites: 116,779 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | AngularJS | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 51,812 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 7,839 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 4,220 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 4,009 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 3,616 | 954 |
| .dk in Denmark | 3,597 | 235 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,213 | 957 |
| .pl in Poland | 2,084 | 456 |
119 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, AngularJS or vanilla-lazyload?
AngularJS is on more sites: 116,779 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use AngularJS and vanilla-lazyload together?
119 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using AngularJS or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.