Home / Technologies / AOS vs vanilla-lazyload
AOS vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
AOS is on more sites: 645,468 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 14.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | AOS | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 309,496 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 23,532 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 20,535 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 20,778 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 18,607 | 957 |
| .net on .net | 11,900 | 954 |
| .pl in Poland | 11,933 | 456 |
| .it in Italy | 10,538 | 504 |
2,308 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, AOS or vanilla-lazyload?
AOS is on more sites: 645,468 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 14.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use AOS and vanilla-lazyload together?
2,308 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using AOS or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.