Home / Technologies / Apollo Client vs fullPage.js
Apollo Client vs fullPage.js: who uses which
fullPage.js is on more sites: 13,127 against 6,569 for Apollo Client, about 2.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Apollo Client | fullPage.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,139 | 6,757 |
| .net on .net | 781 | 322 |
| .kr in South Korea | 4 | 827 |
| .de in Germany | 111 | 389 |
| .cn on .cn | 9 | 476 |
| .ru on .ru | 99 | 357 |
| .org on .org | 149 | 229 |
| .jp in Japan | 9 | 296 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Apollo Client or fullPage.js?
fullPage.js is on more sites: 13,127 against 6,569 for Apollo Client, about 2.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Apollo Client and fullPage.js together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Apollo Client or fullPage.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.