Home / Technologies / Apollo Client vs lazysizes
Apollo Client vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 6,569 for Apollo Client, about 142.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Apollo Client | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,139 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 111 | 50,865 |
| .jp in Japan | 9 | 35,838 |
| .ru on .ru | 99 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 149 | 25,003 |
| .net on .net | 781 | 22,755 |
| .uk in the UK | 33 | 22,214 |
| .br in Brazil | 6 | 17,054 |
23 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Apollo Client or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 6,569 for Apollo Client, about 142.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Apollo Client and lazysizes together?
23 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Apollo Client or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.