Home / Technologies / Apollo Client vs Turbolinks
Apollo Client vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 6,569 for Apollo Client, about 5.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Apollo Client | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,139 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 149 | 2,993 |
| .net on .net | 781 | 757 |
| .de in Germany | 111 | 816 |
| .ru on .ru | 99 | 740 |
| .fm on .fm | 0 | 643 |
| .io on .io | 35 | 604 |
| .jp in Japan | 9 | 622 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Apollo Client or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 6,569 for Apollo Client, about 5.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Apollo Client and Turbolinks together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Apollo Client or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.