Home / Technologies / ASP.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails
ASP.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails: who uses which
Ruby on Rails is on more sites: 292,051 against 163,553 for ASP.NET MVC, about 1.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | ASP.NET MVC | Ruby on Rails |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 78,913 | 162,098 |
| .org on .org | 6,947 | 17,757 |
| .net on .net | 5,026 | 7,577 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,390 | 4,569 |
| .fr in France | 1,153 | 8,978 |
| .de in Germany | 2,753 | 6,498 |
| .jp in Japan | 300 | 8,114 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 3,870 | 2,989 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, ASP.NET MVC or Ruby on Rails?
Ruby on Rails is on more sites: 292,051 against 163,553 for ASP.NET MVC, about 1.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use ASP.NET MVC and Ruby on Rails together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using ASP.NET MVC or Ruby on Rails as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.