Home / Technologies / Astro vs vanilla-lazyload
Astro vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Astro is on more sites: 221,280 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 4.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Astro | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 112,963 | 20,712 |
| .org on .org | 8,528 | 986 |
| .de in Germany | 7,639 | 885 |
| .fr in France | 6,504 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 5,516 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,255 | 957 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,503 | 3,400 |
| .dev on .dev | 3,914 | 25 |
5 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Astro or vanilla-lazyload?
Astro is on more sites: 221,280 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 4.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Astro and vanilla-lazyload together?
5 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Astro or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.