Home / Technologies / Autoptimize vs LiteSpeed Cache
Autoptimize vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 324,941 for Autoptimize, about 1.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Autoptimize | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 126,853 | 255,304 |
| .de in Germany | 44,360 | 8,650 |
| .pl in Poland | 10,642 | 20,679 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,613 | 20,858 |
| .org on .org | 10,051 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 9,703 | 14,644 |
| .br in Brazil | 2,862 | 21,432 |
| .net on .net | 8,388 | 12,770 |
2,037 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Autoptimize or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 324,941 for Autoptimize, about 1.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Autoptimize and LiteSpeed Cache together?
2,037 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Autoptimize or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.