Home / Technologies / Autoptimize vs WP Fastest Cache
Autoptimize vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
Autoptimize is on more sites: 324,941 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Autoptimize | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 126,853 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 44,360 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 9,703 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 10,051 | 8,230 |
| .pl in Poland | 10,642 | 7,433 |
| .ru on .ru | 9,379 | 7,771 |
| .it in Italy | 6,333 | 9,399 |
| .net on .net | 8,388 | 6,735 |
19,465 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Autoptimize or WP Fastest Cache?
Autoptimize is on more sites: 324,941 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Autoptimize and WP Fastest Cache together?
19,465 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Autoptimize or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.