Home / Technologies / Avada vs LiteSpeed Cache
Avada vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 328,017 for Avada, about 1.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Avada | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 128,655 | 255,304 |
| .de in Germany | 41,551 | 8,650 |
| .org on .org | 16,331 | 16,447 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,647 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 4,258 | 20,679 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 10,878 | 13,133 |
| .br in Brazil | 2,083 | 21,432 |
| .fr in France | 8,489 | 14,644 |
10,000 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Avada or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 328,017 for Avada, about 1.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Avada and LiteSpeed Cache together?
10,000 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Avada or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.