Home / Technologies / Avada vs W3 Total Cache
Avada vs W3 Total Cache: who uses which
W3 Total Cache is on more sites: 353,859 against 328,017 for Avada, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Avada | W3 Total Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 128,655 | 137,143 |
| .de in Germany | 41,551 | 25,856 |
| .org on .org | 16,331 | 14,367 |
| .it in Italy | 13,056 | 13,917 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,647 | 9,005 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 10,878 | 8,616 |
| .fr in France | 8,489 | 10,500 |
| .au in Australia | 7,873 | 5,926 |
9,365 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Avada or W3 Total Cache?
W3 Total Cache is on more sites: 353,859 against 328,017 for Avada, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Avada and W3 Total Cache together?
9,365 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Avada or W3 Total Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.