Home / Technologies / Avada vs WP Fastest Cache
Avada vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
Avada is on more sites: 328,017 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Avada | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 128,655 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 41,551 | 39,619 |
| .org on .org | 16,331 | 8,230 |
| .it in Italy | 13,056 | 9,399 |
| .fr in France | 8,489 | 13,724 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,647 | 6,855 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 10,878 | 6,568 |
| .net on .net | 5,365 | 6,735 |
10,484 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Avada or WP Fastest Cache?
Avada is on more sites: 328,017 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Avada and WP Fastest Cache together?
10,484 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Avada or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.