Home / Technologies / Avada vs WP Super Cache
Avada vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
Avada is on more sites: 328,017 against 290,330 for WP Super Cache, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Avada | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 128,655 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 41,551 | 21,667 |
| .org on .org | 16,331 | 14,864 |
| .fr in France | 8,489 | 17,086 |
| .it in Italy | 13,056 | 6,633 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 10,878 | 6,885 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,647 | 5,997 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 5,426 | 12,193 |
6,862 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Avada or WP Super Cache?
Avada is on more sites: 328,017 against 290,330 for WP Super Cache, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Avada and WP Super Cache together?
6,862 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Avada or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.