Home / Technologies / AWS WAF vs Firebase Authentication
AWS WAF vs Firebase Authentication: who uses which
Firebase Authentication is on more sites: 7,333 against 363 for AWS WAF, about 20.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | AWS WAF | Firebase Authentication |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 146 | 3,654 |
| .app on .app | 0 | 420 |
| .in in India | 0 | 269 |
| .org on .org | 0 | 244 |
| .net on .net | 0 | 194 |
| .uk in the UK | 107 | 83 |
| .io on .io | 1 | 141 |
| .au in Australia | 1 | 121 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, AWS WAF or Firebase Authentication?
Firebase Authentication is on more sites: 7,333 against 363 for AWS WAF, about 20.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use AWS WAF and Firebase Authentication together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using AWS WAF or Firebase Authentication as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.