Home / Technologies / AWS WAF vs HUMAN (PerimeterX)
AWS WAF vs HUMAN (PerimeterX): who uses which
HUMAN (PerimeterX) is on more sites: 12,350 against 363 for AWS WAF, about 34.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | AWS WAF | HUMAN (PerimeterX) |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 146 | 9,475 |
| .org on .org | 0 | 618 |
| .co in Colombia | 1 | 322 |
| .uk in the UK | 107 | 114 |
| .io on .io | 1 | 195 |
| .ai on .ai | 0 | 189 |
| .net on .net | 0 | 125 |
| .news on .news | 0 | 123 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, AWS WAF or HUMAN (PerimeterX)?
HUMAN (PerimeterX) is on more sites: 12,350 against 363 for AWS WAF, about 34.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use AWS WAF and HUMAN (PerimeterX) together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using AWS WAF or HUMAN (PerimeterX) as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.