Home / Technologies / Azure AD B2C vs Imperva Incapsula
Azure AD B2C vs Imperva Incapsula: who uses which
Imperva Incapsula is on more sites: 25,436 against 2,530 for Azure AD B2C, about 10.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Azure AD B2C | Imperva Incapsula |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,563 | 12,488 |
| .org on .org | 123 | 1,412 |
| .uk in the UK | 85 | 955 |
| .au in Australia | 83 | 539 |
| .it in Italy | 29 | 579 |
| .jp in Japan | 9 | 525 |
| .net on .net | 53 | 475 |
| .es in Spain | 9 | 515 |
11 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Azure AD B2C or Imperva Incapsula?
Imperva Incapsula is on more sites: 25,436 against 2,530 for Azure AD B2C, about 10.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Azure AD B2C and Imperva Incapsula together?
11 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Azure AD B2C or Imperva Incapsula as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.