Home / Technologies / Babel Polyfill vs intl-tel-input
Babel Polyfill vs intl-tel-input: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 22,009 for Babel Polyfill, about 19.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Babel Polyfill | intl-tel-input |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9,003 | 241,271 |
| .org on .org | 1,756 | 14,730 |
| .de in Germany | 304 | 14,251 |
| .in in India | 436 | 11,664 |
| .uk in the UK | 260 | 11,279 |
| .net on .net | 538 | 8,615 |
| .fr in France | 515 | 8,355 |
| .au in Australia | 312 | 8,090 |
90 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Babel Polyfill or intl-tel-input?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 22,009 for Babel Polyfill, about 19.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Babel Polyfill and intl-tel-input together?
90 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Babel Polyfill or intl-tel-input as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.