Home / Technologies / Babel Polyfill vs Underscore.js
Babel Polyfill vs Underscore.js: who uses which
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 22,009 for Babel Polyfill, about 55.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Babel Polyfill | Underscore.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9,003 | 529,209 |
| .de in Germany | 304 | 73,489 |
| .org on .org | 1,756 | 55,195 |
| .fr in France | 515 | 36,310 |
| .it in Italy | 428 | 35,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 260 | 34,026 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 93 | 25,391 |
| .pl in Poland | 865 | 23,784 |
641 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Babel Polyfill or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 22,009 for Babel Polyfill, about 55.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Babel Polyfill and Underscore.js together?
641 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Babel Polyfill or Underscore.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.