Home / Technologies / Babylon.js vs FilePond
Babylon.js vs FilePond: who uses which
FilePond is on more sites: 2,165 against 143 for Babylon.js, about 15.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Babylon.js | FilePond |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 63 | 800 |
| .de in Germany | 11 | 119 |
| .uk in the UK | 2 | 98 |
| .org on .org | 5 | 82 |
| .ru on .ru | 2 | 83 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1 | 63 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 1 | 57 |
| .fr in France | 2 | 53 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Babylon.js or FilePond?
FilePond is on more sites: 2,165 against 143 for Babylon.js, about 15.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Babylon.js and FilePond together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Babylon.js or FilePond as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.