Home / Technologies / Babylon.js vs Socket.IO
Babylon.js vs Socket.IO: who uses which
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 143 for Babylon.js, about 77.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Babylon.js | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 63 | 4,748 |
| .br in Brazil | 1 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 3 | 558 |
| .org on .org | 5 | 376 |
| .ru on .ru | 2 | 285 |
| .in in India | 0 | 176 |
| .hu in Hungary | 0 | 166 |
| .io on .io | 4 | 154 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Babylon.js or Socket.IO?
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 143 for Babylon.js, about 77.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Babylon.js and Socket.IO together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Babylon.js or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.