Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs FitVids.js
Backbone.js vs FitVids.js: who uses which
FitVids.js is on more sites: 1,121,745 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 7.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | FitVids.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 479,010 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 89,822 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 61,712 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 42,192 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 37,748 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 36,150 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 3,309 | 27,517 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 23,540 |
20,961 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or FitVids.js?
FitVids.js is on more sites: 1,121,745 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 7.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and FitVids.js together?
20,961 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or FitVids.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.