Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs flatpickr
Backbone.js vs flatpickr: who uses which
flatpickr is on more sites: 193,637 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 1.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | flatpickr |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 85,204 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 11,399 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 6,739 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 5,572 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 6,311 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 4,677 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 3,309 | 4,621 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 3,936 |
5,827 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or flatpickr?
flatpickr is on more sites: 193,637 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 1.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and flatpickr together?
5,827 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using Backbone.js or flatpickr as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.