Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs fullPage.js
Backbone.js vs fullPage.js: who uses which
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 12.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | fullPage.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 6,757 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 389 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 229 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 150 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 228 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 210 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 322 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 3,309 | 161 |
60 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or fullPage.js?
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 12.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and fullPage.js together?
60 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or fullPage.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.