Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs Inputmask
Backbone.js vs Inputmask: who uses which
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | Inputmask |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 43,290 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,974 | 45,061 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 4,306 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 3,622 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 1,784 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 2,186 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 1,594 |
| .br in Brazil | 1,769 | 3,931 |
2,378 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or Inputmask?
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and Inputmask together?
2,378 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or Inputmask as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.