Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs Jarallax
Backbone.js vs Jarallax: who uses which
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 1.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | Jarallax |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 129,749 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 16,013 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 11,229 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 10,653 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 8,718 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 6,051 |
| .br in Brazil | 1,769 | 8,657 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 4,957 |
3,350 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or Jarallax?
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 1.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and Jarallax together?
3,350 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or Jarallax as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.