Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs lazysizes
Backbone.js vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 5.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 50,865 |
| .jp in Japan | 641 | 35,838 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,974 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 25,003 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 22,214 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 22,755 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 15,629 |
5,149 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 5.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and lazysizes together?
5,149 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.