Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs PixiJS
Backbone.js vs PixiJS: who uses which
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 43.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | PixiJS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 1,736 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 71 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 175 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 51 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 73 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 147 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 3,309 | 46 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 107 |
27 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or PixiJS?
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 43.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and PixiJS together?
27 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or PixiJS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.