Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs web-vitals
Backbone.js vs web-vitals: who uses which
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 6.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 6,745 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 593 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 115 |
| .br in Brazil | 1,769 | 7,224 |
| .ar in Argentina | 458 | 6,933 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 198 |
| .fr in France | 4,389 | 113 |
| .it in Italy | 4,173 | 85 |
29 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or web-vitals?
Backbone.js is on more sites: 158,499 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 6.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and web-vitals together?
29 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.