Home / Technologies / Backbone.js vs Webpack
Backbone.js vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 17.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backbone.js | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,631 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 9,566 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,171 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 9,456 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 3,231 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 2,869 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 2,779 | 46,584 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 1,710 | 42,006 |
45 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backbone.js or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 158,499 for Backbone.js, about 17.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backbone.js and Webpack together?
45 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backbone.js or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.