Home / Technologies / Backdrop CMS vs LiteSpeed Cache
Backdrop CMS vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 760 for Backdrop CMS, about 733.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Backdrop CMS | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 189 | 255,304 |
| .br in Brazil | 1 | 21,432 |
| .uk in the UK | 32 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 0 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 142 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 6 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 21 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 47 | 12,770 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Backdrop CMS or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 760 for Backdrop CMS, about 733.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Backdrop CMS and LiteSpeed Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Backdrop CMS or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.