Home / Technologies / Barba.js vs FilePond
Barba.js vs FilePond: who uses which
Barba.js is on more sites: 6,852 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 3.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Barba.js | FilePond |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,448 | 800 |
| .de in Germany | 287 | 119 |
| .it in Italy | 241 | 34 |
| .fr in France | 218 | 53 |
| .jp in Japan | 240 | 6 |
| .org on .org | 145 | 82 |
| .uk in the UK | 123 | 98 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 143 | 63 |
4 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Barba.js or FilePond?
Barba.js is on more sites: 6,852 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 3.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Barba.js and FilePond together?
4 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Barba.js or FilePond as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.