Home / Technologies / Barba.js vs PixiJS
Barba.js vs PixiJS: who uses which
Barba.js is on more sites: 6,852 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Barba.js | PixiJS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,448 | 1,736 |
| .de in Germany | 287 | 175 |
| .it in Italy | 241 | 147 |
| .jp in Japan | 240 | 98 |
| .fr in France | 218 | 73 |
| .net on .net | 121 | 107 |
| .org on .org | 145 | 71 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 143 | 46 |
18 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Barba.js or PixiJS?
Barba.js is on more sites: 6,852 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Barba.js and PixiJS together?
18 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Barba.js or PixiJS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.