Home / Technologies / Barba.js vs Slick
Barba.js vs Slick: who uses which
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 6,852 for Barba.js, about 264.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Barba.js | Slick |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,448 | 795,050 |
| .jp in Japan | 240 | 94,724 |
| .de in Germany | 287 | 67,754 |
| .ru on .ru | 79 | 65,489 |
| .org on .org | 145 | 61,699 |
| .uk in the UK | 123 | 49,954 |
| .net on .net | 121 | 42,812 |
| .fr in France | 218 | 42,709 |
608 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Barba.js or Slick?
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 6,852 for Barba.js, about 264.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Barba.js and Slick together?
608 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Barba.js or Slick as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.