Home / Technologies / Barba.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Barba.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 6,852 for Barba.js, about 6.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Barba.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,448 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 79 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 287 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 145 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 123 | 957 |
| .net on .net | 121 | 954 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 143 | 841 |
| .fr in France | 218 | 740 |
82 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Barba.js or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 6,852 for Barba.js, about 6.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Barba.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
82 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Barba.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.