Home / Technologies / Barba.js vs Web Components Polyfills
Barba.js vs Web Components Polyfills: who uses which
Web Components Polyfills is on more sites: 44,489 against 6,852 for Barba.js, about 6.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Barba.js | Web Components Polyfills |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,448 | 7,098 |
| .pl in Poland | 71 | 10,381 |
| .de in Germany | 287 | 9,100 |
| .org on .org | 145 | 2,120 |
| .ru on .ru | 79 | 1,395 |
| .it in Italy | 241 | 1,192 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 91 | 1,235 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 143 | 1,136 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Barba.js or Web Components Polyfills?
Web Components Polyfills is on more sites: 44,489 against 6,852 for Barba.js, about 6.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Barba.js and Web Components Polyfills together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Barba.js or Web Components Polyfills as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.