Home / Technologies / 1C-Bitrix vs LiteSpeed Cache
1C-Bitrix vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 127,776 for 1C-Bitrix, about 4.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | 1C-Bitrix | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 8,495 | 255,304 |
| .ru on .ru | 96,199 | 1,958 |
| .br in Brazil | 116 | 21,432 |
| .uk in the UK | 48 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 86 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 710 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 15 | 14,644 |
| .net on .net | 619 | 12,770 |
3 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, 1C-Bitrix or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 127,776 for 1C-Bitrix, about 4.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use 1C-Bitrix and LiteSpeed Cache together?
3 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using 1C-Bitrix or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.