Home / Technologies / Bloomreach Experience Manager vs LiteSpeed Cache
Bloomreach Experience Manager vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 1,351 for Bloomreach Experience Manager, about 412.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Bloomreach Experience Manager | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 257 | 255,304 |
| .br in Brazil | 4 | 21,432 |
| .uk in the UK | 42 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 16 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 126 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 6 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 559 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 18 | 12,770 |
4 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Bloomreach Experience Manager or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 1,351 for Bloomreach Experience Manager, about 412.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Bloomreach Experience Manager and LiteSpeed Cache together?
4 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Bloomreach Experience Manager or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.