Home / Technologies / BlueConic vs Google Optimize
BlueConic vs Google Optimize: who uses which
Google Optimize is on more sites: 16,167 against 249 for BlueConic, about 64.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | BlueConic | Google Optimize |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 129 | 8,741 |
| .ru on .ru | 0 | 497 |
| .org on .org | 8 | 414 |
| .link on .link | 0 | 380 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 49 | 323 |
| .br in Brazil | 0 | 371 |
| .uk in the UK | 3 | 334 |
| .jp in Japan | 0 | 329 |
5 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, BlueConic or Google Optimize?
Google Optimize is on more sites: 16,167 against 249 for BlueConic, about 64.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use BlueConic and Google Optimize together?
5 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using BlueConic or Google Optimize as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.