Home / Technologies / Bridge vs LiteSpeed Cache
Bridge vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 66,613 for Bridge, about 8.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Bridge | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 28,244 | 255,304 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,099 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 571 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 1,110 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 2,444 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 1,754 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,944 | 13,133 |
| .au in Australia | 1,939 | 12,134 |
2,149 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Bridge or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 66,613 for Bridge, about 8.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Bridge and LiteSpeed Cache together?
2,149 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Bridge or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.