Home / Technologies / BuddyPress vs LiteSpeed Cache
BuddyPress vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 15,167 for BuddyPress, about 36.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | BuddyPress | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,066 | 255,304 |
| .br in Brazil | 162 | 21,432 |
| .uk in the UK | 393 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 197 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 1,533 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 405 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 259 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 503 | 12,770 |
446 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, BuddyPress or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 15,167 for BuddyPress, about 36.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use BuddyPress and LiteSpeed Cache together?
446 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using BuddyPress or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.