Home / Technologies / BuddyPress vs WP Super Cache
BuddyPress vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 15,167 for BuddyPress, about 19.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | BuddyPress | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,066 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 760 | 21,667 |
| .fr in France | 405 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 1,533 | 14,864 |
| .ru on .ru | 362 | 12,192 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 102 | 12,193 |
| .net on .net | 503 | 6,694 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 259 | 6,885 |
286 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, BuddyPress or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 15,167 for BuddyPress, about 19.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use BuddyPress and WP Super Cache together?
286 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using BuddyPress or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.