Home / Technologies / Bullseye Locations vs MetaLocator
Bullseye Locations vs MetaLocator: who uses which
MetaLocator is on more sites: 52 against 40 for Bullseye Locations, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Bullseye Locations | MetaLocator |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 35 | 35 |
| .org on .org | 2 | 5 |
| .au in Australia | 1 | 3 |
| .es in Spain | 0 | 2 |
| .de in Germany | 0 | 2 |
| .it in Italy | 1 | 0 |
| .nz in New Zealand | 1 | 0 |
| .io on .io | 0 | 1 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Bullseye Locations or MetaLocator?
MetaLocator is on more sites: 52 against 40 for Bullseye Locations, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Bullseye Locations and MetaLocator together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Bullseye Locations or MetaLocator as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.